Lindsay Lohan Naked? Nope, But We’re Down Anyway

Harvey Edwards, the photographer known for taking the iconic "Leg Warmers" picture, says that he was the first person to ever take nude pictures of Lindsay Lohan. Lohan and her crew say it's a bunch of baloney. Guess what? Lohan is right.

In Edwards's exclusive interview with Rumor Fix, he says that he asked her to pose for tasteful semi-nude pictures five years ago (after "Mean Girls"), Lindsay showed up soon after with her mom, Dina, in tow. Allegedly, both Lohans were happy with Edward's product.

Naturally, Lindsay denies ever working with Edwards, and Dina says she's never even spoken to the guy. That kind of denial is normal when it comes to celebrity nudes, but honestly, Edwards is probably lying. The photos in question (seen above) are supposed to be of Lindsay, but you can tell by the tattoo and hair length that there are at least two different women (possibly three) in those pictures. One of them could be Lindsay Lohan, but we doubt it. Why would she hide the fact that she posed nude many years ago when she's going to appear in Playboy next month?

Oh, and on that note, Edwards is being oddly critical of Lohan's decision to pose naked for Playboy. "It's a mistake!" he says. "I think she is extremely talented—I think she doesn't have to do it. I don't believe that people pick up Playboy as an art magazine. I believe they only pick it up to get their jollies!" OMFG, NO WAY!

The 65-year old photographer goes on to shame anyone who shows her tits and pubic hair in photographs: "I feel it's degrading to [Lohan] to do that—especially on a level of working as an actress." Way to go, Harvey Edwards. We could understand if he claimed connection to Lohan in order to stimulate poster sales, but he didn't have to criticize her decisions, and he certainly didn't need to say that showing naughty bits is degrading for an actress. And how is straddling a motorcycle any better? It's a giant vibrator, Harvey.

· Via Rumor Fix (rumorfix.com)