The Senate has passed the Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA) with an overwhelming majority of 91-3. This bill, designed to allow federal and state governments to investigate and sue websites that purportedly cause mental distress to minors, has sparked intense debate over its potential implications for internet freedom and censorship.

Proponents of KOSA have highlighted tragic stories of youth suffering from anxiety, eating disorders, drug abuse, and other issues, arguing that the internet exacerbates these problems. They contend that KOSA is a necessary step to protect children from harmful online content.

However, opponents argue that such issues existed long before the internet and that KOSA could lead to dangerous overreach by politicians and bureaucrats in deciding what people can read and view online. They fear the bill could lead to censorship and stifle free expression on the internet.

The bill’s passage in the Senate means the House of Representatives could take it up for a vote at any time. Alternatively, the House might debate its version of the bill, which also faces significant criticism. Several House members have already expressed concerns about the legislation.

Critics of KOSA warn that the bill could allow the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and state attorneys general to determine what content is harmful to minors and pursue legal action against websites hosting such content. This could result in widespread content removal and increased use of ID checks, age gates, and invasive content filters, affecting both minors and adults.

The potential for abuse of KOSA’s provisions is a major concern. Critics argue that the bill’s broad language could be used to target educational materials, mental health discussions, and content related to sex education and LGBTQ+ issues. The fear is that political motivations could drive enforcement actions, leading to the suppression of constitutionally protected speech.

One bill sponsor has suggested that educational materials on the history of racism could be deemed harmful, raising alarms about the potential for censorship of important societal discussions. Similarly, online content about mental health and activism could be stifled if deemed to cause anxiety or other distress.

Organizations like the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) have voiced strong opposition to KOSA, highlighting its unconstitutional aspects and the potential for broad censorship. Despite these concerns, lawmakers have largely dismissed these issues, focusing instead on the bill’s purported benefits.

As the bill moves to the House, public awareness and opposition are crucial. Advocacy groups urge citizens to contact their representatives and express their concerns about KOSA’s impact on internet freedom and free speech.

If you’d like to stop Congress from censoring your internet, you can click here to join the EFF and take action. If we don’t do something today, then you won’t have that chance tomorrow.

The passing of KOSA in the Senate marks a critical juncture in the ongoing debate over internet regulation and censorship. While the bill aims to protect children from harmful content, its broad provisions and potential for abuse raise significant concerns about the future of free expression online.

You can follow the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) on X at @EFF